| Structural highlights
Function
AUR25_RANAE Amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptide with moderate to potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi (PubMed:10951191, PubMed:19056250, PubMed:23841919, PubMed:24728560, PubMed:31358802). Shows also a weak activity against biofilm of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (PubMed:19056250). Probably acts by disturbing membrane functions with its amphipathic structure (PubMed:10951191, PubMed:23841919). Kills fungi via membranolytic action (PubMed:24728560). Enhanced sterol levels in lipid composition membranes reduce interaction of this peptide with membranes, having a protective effect against the lytic ability of the peptide (PubMed:24728560). Shows anticancer activity (PubMed:10951191).[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Publication Abstract from PubMed
Frogs such as Rana temporaria and Litoria aurea secrete numerous closely related antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as an effective chemical dermal defence. Damage or penetration of the bacterial plasma membrane is considered essential for AMP activity and such properties are commonly ascribed to their ability to form secondary amphipathic, alpha-helix conformations in membrane mimicking milieu. Nevertheless, despite the high similarity in physical properties and preference for adopting such conformations, the spectrum of activity and potency of AMPs often varies considerably. Hence distinguishing apparently similar AMPs according to their behaviour in, and effects on, model membranes will inform understanding of primary-sequence-specific antimicrobial mechanisms. Here we use a combination of molecular dynamics simulations, circular dichroism and patch-clamp to investigate the basis for differing anti-bacterial activities in representative AMPs from each species; temporin L and aurein 2.5. Despite adopting near identical, alpha-helix conformations in the steady-state in a variety of membrane models, these two AMPs can be distinguished both in vitro and in silico based on their dynamic interactions with model membranes, notably their differing conformational flexibility at the N-terminus, ability to form higher order aggregates and the characteristics of induced ion conductance. Taken together, these differences provide an explanation of the greater potency and broader antibacterial spectrum of activity of temporin L over aurein 2.5. Consequently, while the secondary amphipathic, alpha-helix conformation is a key determinant of the ability of a cationic AMP to penetrate and disrupt the bacterial plasma membrane, the exact mechanism, potency and spectrum of activity is determined by precise structural and dynamic contributions from specific residues in each AMP sequence.
Temporin L and aurein 2.5 have identical conformations but subtly distinct membrane and antibacterial activities.,Manzo G, Ferguson PM, Hind CK, Clifford M, Gustilo VB, Ali H, Bansal SS, Bui TT, Drake AF, Atkinson RA, Sutton JM, Lorenz CD, Phoenix DA, Mason AJ Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w. PMID:31358802[6]
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
References
- ↑ Rozek T, Wegener KL, Bowie JH, Olver IN, Carver JA, Wallace JC, Tyler MJ. The antibiotic and anticancer active aurein peptides from the Australian Bell Frogs Litoria aurea and Litoria raniformis the solution structure of aurein 1.2. Eur J Biochem. 2000 Sep;267(17):5330-41. PMID:10951191 doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01536.x
- ↑ Dennison SR, Morton LH, Shorrocks AJ, Harris F, Phoenix DA. A study on the interactions of Aurein 2.5 with bacterial membranes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2009 Feb 1;68(2):225-30. PMID:19056250 doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.10.007
- ↑ Dennison SR, Harris F, Morton LH, Phoenix DA. Antimicrobial activity of aurein 2.5 against yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013 Sep;346(2):140-5. PMID:23841919 doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12212
- ↑ Dennison SR, Morton LH, Harris F, Phoenix DA. The interaction of aurein 2.5 with fungal membranes. Eur Biophys J. 2014 Jul;43(6-7):255-64. PMID:24728560 doi:10.1007/s00249-014-0959-8
- ↑ Manzo G, Ferguson PM, Hind CK, Clifford M, Gustilo VB, Ali H, Bansal SS, Bui TT, Drake AF, Atkinson RA, Sutton JM, Lorenz CD, Phoenix DA, Mason AJ. Temporin L and aurein 2.5 have identical conformations but subtly distinct membrane and antibacterial activities. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w. PMID:31358802 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w
- ↑ Manzo G, Ferguson PM, Hind CK, Clifford M, Gustilo VB, Ali H, Bansal SS, Bui TT, Drake AF, Atkinson RA, Sutton JM, Lorenz CD, Phoenix DA, Mason AJ. Temporin L and aurein 2.5 have identical conformations but subtly distinct membrane and antibacterial activities. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w. PMID:31358802 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47327-w
|