Journal:Acta Cryst D:S2059798324008246
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)

| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In this study, we report the discovery of a novel orthorhombic crystal form of NowGFP and conduct a detailed comparison with the known monoclinic crystal form. Our investigations primarily focused on the crystal contacts, revealing that both forms exhibit similar zig-zag linear assemblies of protein molecules, resulting from crystal contact I. The key distinction between the two forms lies in their stacking modes: parallel stacking for the monoclinic form and perpendicular stacking for the orthorhombic form. This difference in packing correlates with a specific crystal contact, referred to as crystal contact II (or IIAB), and results in an alteration of one molecule in the symmetry unit of the orthorhombic crystal form, designated as Orth(B). Given that these structural shifts are predominantly concentrated between β-strands 7 to 10, which are known for their partial flexibility, we propose that this altered molecule represents an alternative conformational state of NowGFP. In contrast, the other molecule in the orthorhombic form, Orth(A), remains unchanged and is similar to that found in the monoclinic form. | In this study, we report the discovery of a novel orthorhombic crystal form of NowGFP and conduct a detailed comparison with the known monoclinic crystal form. Our investigations primarily focused on the crystal contacts, revealing that both forms exhibit similar zig-zag linear assemblies of protein molecules, resulting from crystal contact I. The key distinction between the two forms lies in their stacking modes: parallel stacking for the monoclinic form and perpendicular stacking for the orthorhombic form. This difference in packing correlates with a specific crystal contact, referred to as crystal contact II (or IIAB), and results in an alteration of one molecule in the symmetry unit of the orthorhombic crystal form, designated as Orth(B). Given that these structural shifts are predominantly concentrated between β-strands 7 to 10, which are known for their partial flexibility, we propose that this altered molecule represents an alternative conformational state of NowGFP. In contrast, the other molecule in the orthorhombic form, Orth(A), remains unchanged and is similar to that found in the monoclinic form. | ||
| - | Significantly, this new conformational state of NowGFP captured in the orthorhombic crystal packing exhibits different functional behavior: the key residue Lys61, which is known for its pH-dependent shifts from k1 to k2 conformations, appears locked in a k1 configuration regardless of pH conditions. Specifically, this can be seen at pH 9.0, that Lys-61 in <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6a/16'>Orth(A)</scene> has two alternative conformations (80% in k1 and 20% in k2) while Lys-61 in <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6b/8'>Orth(B)</scene> is seen to only be in the k1 conformation. At ph 6.0 <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6c/7'>Orth(A) </scene> has two alternative conformations (50% in k1 and 50% in k2) while <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6d/3'> Orth(B)</scene> is seen to only be in the k1 conformation. The <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6e/2'>monoclinic)</scene> form, at pH 6.0, has only one molecule in the asymmetric unit, with Lys-61 showing two conformations has (20% in k1 and 80% in k2). | + | Significantly, this new conformational state of NowGFP captured in the orthorhombic crystal packing exhibits different functional behavior: the key residue Lys61, which is known for its pH-dependent shifts from k1 to k2 conformations, appears locked in a k1 configuration regardless of pH conditions. Specifically, this can be seen at pH 9.0, that Lys-61 in <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6a/16'>Orth(A)</scene> has two alternative conformations (80% in k1 and 20% in k2) while Lys-61 in <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6b/8'>Orth(B)</scene> is seen to only be in the k1 conformation. |
| + | |||
| + | <jmol> | ||
| + | <jmolButton> | ||
| + | <script>script /scripts/10/1056673/Fig_6a/16.spt | ||
| + | hide water; set zshade off</script> | ||
| + | <text>Orth(A) pH 9.0</text> | ||
| + | </jmolButton> | ||
| + | </jmol> | ||
| + | |||
| + | At ph 6.0 <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6c/7'>Orth(A) </scene> has two alternative conformations (50% in k1 and 50% in k2) while <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6d/3'> Orth(B)</scene> is seen to only be in the k1 conformation. The <scene name='10/1056673/Fig_6e/2'>monoclinic)</scene> form, at pH 6.0, has only one molecule in the asymmetric unit, with Lys-61 showing two conformations has (20% in k1 and 80% in k2). | ||
This contrasts with the unaltered molecule, in which Lys61 exhibits the pH-dependent movement as expected. These observations provide valuable insights into how crystal lattice packing influences the conformational states of protein molecules, enhancing our understanding of protein structure's conformational flexibility. | This contrasts with the unaltered molecule, in which Lys61 exhibits the pH-dependent movement as expected. These observations provide valuable insights into how crystal lattice packing influences the conformational states of protein molecules, enhancing our understanding of protein structure's conformational flexibility. | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 10 October 2024
| |||||||||||
This page complements a publication in scientific journals and is one of the Proteopedia's Interactive 3D Complement pages. For aditional details please see I3DC.
