Sandbox Try 3

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (15:25, 19 July 2025) (edit) (undo)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
The cross-linking activity of Fascin1 is closely related to its structure and dynamic properties. Fascin1 is arranged in four β-trefoil-like domains (F1-F4) organized in two semi-independent lobes <scene name='10/1084959/016_9fn6_monomer/3'>F1 to F2 and F3 to F4</scene>. This structural organization facilitates coupling between domains and enables the accommodation of various inter-filament orientations, thereby bridging mismatches between the helical symmetry of F-actin and the hexagonal packing of the actin bundles. Two major acting-binding sites (ABS) have been identified: ABS1, consisting of the N- and C-terminal regions and the cleft between the F1 and F4 domains; and ABS2, located on the opposite side of the molecule and consisting of amino acids from the F1 and F2 domains. In addition to these, a third actin binding site (ABS3) formed by residues from the F3 domain has been proposed. <br>
The cross-linking activity of Fascin1 is closely related to its structure and dynamic properties. Fascin1 is arranged in four β-trefoil-like domains (F1-F4) organized in two semi-independent lobes <scene name='10/1084959/016_9fn6_monomer/3'>F1 to F2 and F3 to F4</scene>. This structural organization facilitates coupling between domains and enables the accommodation of various inter-filament orientations, thereby bridging mismatches between the helical symmetry of F-actin and the hexagonal packing of the actin bundles. Two major acting-binding sites (ABS) have been identified: ABS1, consisting of the N- and C-terminal regions and the cleft between the F1 and F4 domains; and ABS2, located on the opposite side of the molecule and consisting of amino acids from the F1 and F2 domains. In addition to these, a third actin binding site (ABS3) formed by residues from the F3 domain has been proposed. <br>
Our study suggests that the protein exists in various conformational substates prior to ligand binding, and this supports a mechanism of conformational selection. We have modelled for the first time the complete structure of the free wild-type human Fascin1 from the N-terminus to the C-terminus without interruptions and compared it with previously reported crystal structures. The rmsd. values for the alignment indicate structural similarities among all structures. However, the visual inspection shows larger differences in loop regions and solvent-exposed areas. β-trefoil domains 1 and 3, which have been reported to be somewhat interconnected, show the lowest rmsd. values, highlighting their resembling conformation. The high plasticity of Fascin1 is particularly evident in the molecule B of our structure, which captures larger conformational departures from previous structures. <br>
Our study suggests that the protein exists in various conformational substates prior to ligand binding, and this supports a mechanism of conformational selection. We have modelled for the first time the complete structure of the free wild-type human Fascin1 from the N-terminus to the C-terminus without interruptions and compared it with previously reported crystal structures. The rmsd. values for the alignment indicate structural similarities among all structures. However, the visual inspection shows larger differences in loop regions and solvent-exposed areas. β-trefoil domains 1 and 3, which have been reported to be somewhat interconnected, show the lowest rmsd. values, highlighting their resembling conformation. The high plasticity of Fascin1 is particularly evident in the molecule B of our structure, which captures larger conformational departures from previous structures. <br>
-
To further investigate the flexibility of human fascin1, we carried out a structural alignment of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit and observed that even though the rmsd value indicates that the two molecules are similar (1.13 Å), a visual inspection of the superimposition shows that there are significant differences between the two chains of the <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/16'>fascin1 dimer</scene>. <scene name='10/1086040/Try_3_compare/3'>superimpose</scene>
+
To further investigate the flexibility of human fascin1, we carried out a structural alignment of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit and observed that even though the rmsd value indicates that the two molecules are similar (1.13 Å), a visual inspection of the superimposition shows that there are significant differences between the two chains of the <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/16'>fascin1 dimer</scene>. <jmol><jmolButton>
-
<jmol>
+
-
<jmolButton>
+
<script>compare {*:B} {*:A} SUBSET{*.CA} ATOMS{protein}{protein} ROTATE TRANSLATE 2.0</script>
<script>compare {*:B} {*:A} SUBSET{*.CA} ATOMS{protein}{protein} ROTATE TRANSLATE 2.0</script>
<text>Superimpose!</text>
<text>Superimpose!</text>
</jmolButton>
</jmolButton>
-
</jmol>
+
</jmol><scene name='10/1086040/Try_3_zoom_label/1'>zoom and label</scene> These differences are mostly found in loop regions, especially in the regions comprising <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/22'>3 conformationally variable regions</scene> in β-trefoil domains, Focus on residues region one <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/19'>49 to 60</scene>; region two <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/20'>274 to 281</scene>; and region three <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/21'>395 to 405</scene>.
-
 
+
-
<scene name='10/1086040/Try_3_zoom_label/1'>zoom and label</scene>
+
-
 
+
-
<jmol>
+
-
<jmolButton>
+
-
<script>select *:A.CA; trace .25; moveto /* time, axisAngle */ 1.0 { -487 873 31 81.77} /* zoom, translation */ 107.57 12.67 -5.78 /* center, rotationRadius */ {-16.0325 -36.4115 14.2045} 61.710163 /* navigation center, translation, depth */ {0 0 0} 0 0 0 /* cameraDepth, cameraX, cameraY */ 3.0 0.0 0.0;set zshade on; set zShadePower 2; set perspectiveDepth true;
+
-
select (74:A.CA); label "\u03b2-trefold 1"; font label 15 sans; set labeloffset 20 10; color label black;
+
-
select (232:A.CA); label "\u03b2-trefold 2"; font label 15 sans; set labeloffset -20 10; color label black;
+
-
select (375:A.CA); label "\u03b2-trefold 3"; font label 15 sans; set labeloffset 20 10; color label black;
+
-
select (473:A.CA); label "\u03b2-trefold 4"; font label 15 sans; set labeloffset 10 0; color label black;</script>
+
-
<text>Zoom in</text>
+
-
</jmolButton>
+
-
</jmol>. These differences are mostly found in loop regions, especially in the regions comprising <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/22'>3 conformationally variable regions</scene> in β-trefoil domains, Focus on residues region one <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/19'>49 to 60</scene>; region two <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/20'>274 to 281</scene>; and region three <scene name='10/1084959/016_fig_04_dimer/21'>395 to 405</scene>.
+
<br>
<br>
Fascin1 would only bind actin monomers if there is a proper spatial alignment of its major actin-binding sites. The structural differences between the ‘active’ and ‘inactive’ conformations of Fascin1 are subtle, limited to variations in loop and strand geometry that do not drastically alter the overall fold of the protein. Our results indicate that the protein`s structural flexibility is due to a salt bridge network established between its charged residues. These interactions introduce a certain rigidity into the protein that may or may not be beneficial for the actin binding activity. Specifically, we did not observe the presence of salt bridges between β-trefoil domains 1 and 4, which constitute the ABS1. This absence points to a dynamic region that requires flexibility for the initial contact with actin filaments.
Fascin1 would only bind actin monomers if there is a proper spatial alignment of its major actin-binding sites. The structural differences between the ‘active’ and ‘inactive’ conformations of Fascin1 are subtle, limited to variations in loop and strand geometry that do not drastically alter the overall fold of the protein. Our results indicate that the protein`s structural flexibility is due to a salt bridge network established between its charged residues. These interactions introduce a certain rigidity into the protein that may or may not be beneficial for the actin binding activity. Specifically, we did not observe the presence of salt bridges between β-trefoil domains 1 and 4, which constitute the ABS1. This absence points to a dynamic region that requires flexibility for the initial contact with actin filaments.

Current revision

fascin1 9fn6 colored by its 4 β-Trefoil domains

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate
Personal tools