User:Ananya Narayanan/Sandbox 1
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Pharmacalogical Profile of PF-06882961 and CHU-128== | == Pharmacalogical Profile of PF-06882961 and CHU-128== | ||
| - | There are multiple GLP-1R pathways: cAMP, pERK1/2, intracellular calcium, β-arrestin recruitment, Gs conformational change, and receptor internalization. The small peptide agonists | + | There are multiple GLP-1R pathways: cAMP, pERK1/2, intracellular calcium, β-arrestin recruitment, Gs conformational change, and receptor internalization. The small peptide agonists displayed different signalling behaviours across these pathways. Both non-peptides were potent and full agonists for cAMP production, showing ~30-fold lower potency than GLP-1 and similar ability to induce Gs activation. However, CHU-128 was inactive in every other pathway, even at high concentrations, indicating extreme Gs/cAMP bias. |
| - | In contrast, PF-06882961 activated all pathways, although with reduced potency. | + | In contrast, PF-06882961 activated all pathways, although with reduced potency. PF-06882961 also had only subtle biased agonism compared to GLP-1. Despite CHU-128 having ~10-fold higher binding affinity than PF-06882961, PF-06882961 displays higher efficacy in cAMP signalling. |
| - | The data suggests that PF-06882961 behaves similarly to GLP-1 in overall signalling and receptor regulation, whereas CHU-128 displays narrow, cAMP-restricted profiles.These contrasting | + | The data suggests that PF-06882961 behaves similarly to GLP-1 in overall signalling and receptor regulation, whereas CHU-128 displays narrow, cAMP-restricted profiles.These contrasting signalling behaviours make understanding the structural basis of how each small molecule engages GLP-1R of utmost importance. |
| - | == | + | == Structural Basis of GLP-1R Activation by Peptide and Small Molecule Agonists== |
| + | High-resolution cryo-EM structures of human GLP-1R in complex with GLP-1, PF-06882961, or CHU-128 gave an understanding of how these agonists engage and activate the receptor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The GLP-1 bound receptor showed extensive peptide interactions across the transmembrane pocket, extracellular loops, and a deep water-mediated hydrogen-bond network critical for receptor activation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Binding of the Small Molecule Agonists seemed more superificial but was still distinct. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CHU-128 occupied a planar orientation with limited overlap to the peptide and failed to engage key TM7 and water-network interactions, whereas PF-06882961 adopted a deeper, elongated pose that overlapped the GLP-1 N-terminal binding region and stabilised a rich structural water network similar to that observed for the peptide. This differential binding might explain why PF-06882961 has a broad signalling profile like GLP-1. | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
Revision as of 11:25, 28 November 2025
Differential GLP-1R Binding and Activation by Peptide and Non-peptide Agonists
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ Hanson, R. M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T. and Sussman, J. L. (2013), JSmol and the Next-Generation Web-Based Representation of 3D Molecular Structure as Applied to Proteopedia. Isr. J. Chem., 53:207-216. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300024
- ↑ Herraez A. Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006 Jul;34(4):255-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644. PMID:21638687 doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042644
