Sandbox 323

From Proteopedia

Revision as of 00:57, 29 April 2024 by Jennah Hoke (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Proposed Structure of 3DS8 Protein

3DS8 Structure

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Experimental

The beginning experiments were conducted on molecular docking sites to compare the structure of the 3DS8 active site with known proteins. Using the SPRITE database [2], the 3DS8 protein was matched with a few proteases through right-handed superpositions with RMSD values ranging from 1.20-1.40, indicating relative similarities. The left-handed superpositions matched with more trypsins and displayed better RMSD values ranging from 0.93-1.11.


The 3DS8 protein did not have many very specific active site matches with known proteins on the Chimera software [3], however, it was very similar to trypsin, alpha-chymotrypsin, and proteinase B. The function of 3DS8 is most likely very similar to those since the active sites have the same amino acids and structures that differ within <4 angstroms.


The Dali database [4] was used to determine the conserved sequences within the 3ds8 protein. The majority of the hits were lipases with Z-scores up to 31.8, meaning the proteins are homologous to the 3ds8 structure because they are higher than 20. Some hits had high LALI numbers that indicate matching residues in the structure. The active site residues are G104, S102, H222, D188. Each of these is conserved in the 4 selected protein matches, which means that the active site is conserved. The 3ds8 active site is conserved in many other proteins with similar functions, many of which are lipases. Since the 3DS8 has so many structural similarities to lipases, it most likely has the same functionality as the known proteins.


The BLAST database [5] was utilized to search for similar gene sequences and corresponding residue patterns. Using the FASTA sequence, the 3DS8 sequence is matched with similar proteins in an alignment that shows similar positions of matching residues. The superfamily of 3ds8 is an αβ-hydrolase. Function and cellular position are unknown, but it is hydrolase-like and exists in bacteria. The 3DS8 protein is part of the superfamily of alpha-beta hydrolases, so it most likely has the same function. Many structural and sequential similarities are conserved between 3DS8 and matched proteins, indicating that 3DS8 could very well be a hydrolase.


FASTA sequence of 3DS8: KDQIPIILIHGSGGNASSLDKMADQLMNEYRSSNEALTMTVNSEGKIKFEGKLTKDAKRPIIKFGFEQNQATPDDWSKWLKIAMEDLKSRYGFTQMDGVGHSNGGLALTYYAEDYAGDKTVPTLRKLVAIGSPFND LDPNDNGMDLSFKKLPNSTPQMDYFIKNQTEVSPDLEVLAIAGELSEDNPTDGIVPTISSLATRLFMPGSAKAYIEDIQVGEDAVHQTLHETPKSIEKTYWFLEKFKTDETVIQLDYK


InterPro Scan [6] searched for structure and taxonomy relations. The results have information about the domains and families of the protein. At the bottom, there are biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components to learn more about the protein and where it originates from. InterPro confirmed that 3DS8 is most likely a hydrolase. Since 3DS8 is part of the hydrolase superfamily, its structure and function are likely to be that of some sort of hydrolase.


The last molecular modeling strategy was using SwissDock to investigate different ligands for 3DS8. Using the previously mentioned 4 residues that make up the active site, there were a few ligands that demonstrated promising binding to 3DS8. The best choices would be PNP alpha-D-glucopyranoside or PNP N-acetyl-Beta-D-glucosaminide because they are close to the residues of the active site.


The molecular weight of 3DS8 is proposed to be about 28 kDa.

In the laboratory, the gene was transformed into E. coli bacteria, expressed, and isolated by cell lysis and nickel column. The cell lysis buffer used was a sodium phosphate buffer. From the column, 10 elution fractions were collected. A Bradford assay with standards of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mg/mL of Bovine Serum Albumin solution. The standards were measured on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 595 nm. Initially, a few of the elution fraction were out of the standard range of absorbance, so the samples were remade by diluting further. After the second round of absorbances were obtained, only elution 4 was still out of range. Then Beer's law was used to determine the concentrations (mg/mL) of each elution fraction: E1=0.4026, E2=5.968, E3=5.434, E4=-0.1407, E5=0.5610, E6=0.4229, E7=0.03175, E8=0.1461, E9=0.2693, E10=0.2244.

Fraction E1 through E6 were chosen to be run on an SDS-PAGE gel because they contained the highest amounts of protein. After running for an hour on 100-150 mV, the gel was stained and destained. The bands appeared around 30 kDa and fractions E2-E6 were pure.

The ligand used for testing was p-nitrophenyl aldehyde in pH's of 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. In each cuvette, 5 µL of protein, 50 µL of ligand, and 1.5 mL buffer (varying pH) were added. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm for 30 min, taking a reading every minute until 20 minutes, then every 20 seconds.

Discussion

Conclusions

References

1. Sharkawy, M.; Carter, A.A.; Craig, P. Function Identification of the Protein Product of Gene Lin2722 from Listeria innocua using Computational and In-Vitro Techniques. https://www.cell.com/biophysj/pdf/S0006-3495(18)31671-0.pdf 2. http://211.25.251.163/sprite/ 3. https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/download.html 4. http://ekhidna2.biocenter.helsinki.fi/dali/ 5. https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi 6. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/

Personal tools