Retractions and Fraud

From Proteopedia

proteopedia linkproteopedia link

A number of PDB entries have been retracted, either due to fraud or honest mistakes^[1].

• 2012, February: 3k78 was removed from the PDB because it appears to be fraudlent^[2][3].

• 2009 and subsequently, several entries authored by H.M. Krishna Murthy were removed from the PDB as they appear to be fraudulent. Those already removed, as well as those for which removal is pending, are listed at Murthy fraud. See also this list of possibly fraudlent entries co-authored by Murthy. See the statement by the Worldwide PDB^[1] and the discussion of fraud^[4] on the PDB email list and the official statement by the University of Alabama^[5]

References

1. ↑ ^{1.0 1.1} wwPDB Statement on Retraction of PDB Entries.
2. ↑ Abbott A. Trial tests Austrian integrity body. Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. PMID:22552066 doi:10.1038/485015a
3. ↑ Protein structure retracted after investigation into “highly improbable features,” journal calls it fraud, April 2012
4. ↑ Discussion of fraud on the PDB email list.
5. ↑ Official statement by the University of Alabama on fraudlent PDB entries by H. M. Krishna Murthy . This statement includes detailed information about the analysis of each entry by outside experts.