Structural highlights
6d8f is a 6 chain structure. Full crystallographic information is available from OCA. For a guided tour on the structure components use FirstGlance.
|
Ligands: | , , |
Related: | 6d8a, 6d8p, 6d95, 6d92 |
Resources: | FirstGlance, OCA, PDBe, RCSB, PDBsum, ProSAT |
Publication Abstract from PubMed
Prokaryotic Argonaute (Ago) proteins were recently shown to target foreign genetic elements, thus making them a perfect model for studies of interference mechanisms. Here, we study interactions of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Ago (RsAgo) with guide RNA (gRNA) and fully complementary or imperfect target DNA (tDNA) using biochemical and structural approaches. We show that RsAgo can specifically recognize both the first nucleotide in gRNA and complementary nucleotide in tDNA, and both interactions contribute to nucleic acid binding. Non-canonical pairs and bulges on the target strand can be accommodated by RsAgo with minimal perturbation of the duplex but significantly reduce RsAgo affinity to tDNA. Surprisingly, mismatches between gRNA and tDNA induce dissociation of the guide-target duplex from RsAgo. Our results reveal plasticity in the ability of Ago proteins to accommodate helical imperfections, show how this might affect the efficiency of RNA silencing, and suggest a potential mechanism for guide release and Ago recycling.
Accommodation of Helical Imperfections in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Argonaute Ternary Complexes with Guide RNA and Target DNA.,Liu Y, Esyunina D, Olovnikov I, Teplova M, Kulbachinskiy A, Aravin AA, Patel DJ Cell Rep. 2018 Jul 10;24(2):453-462. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.021. PMID:29996105[1]
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
References
- ↑ Liu Y, Esyunina D, Olovnikov I, Teplova M, Kulbachinskiy A, Aravin AA, Patel DJ. Accommodation of Helical Imperfections in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Argonaute Ternary Complexes with Guide RNA and Target DNA. Cell Rep. 2018 Jul 10;24(2):453-462. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.021. PMID:29996105 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.021