User:Marius Mihasan/Sandbox 1

From Proteopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Proteopedia and 3D Printing

Physical molecular models, by engaging both visual and tactile senses, provide an effective means for deepening the understanding of complex concepts in molecular biology and biochemistry. They allow students to perceive the three-dimensional organization of macromolecules, thereby enhancing comprehension of the relationship between structure and function [1] [2] . Numerous studies have demonstrated that the use of tangible models in science education improves learning outcomes, fosters conceptual reasoning, and increases student engagement [3] [4] [5]. Rapid development of 3D-printing technologies has made it possible to create customized and affordable molecular models [6] [7] [8].

Affordable 3D printers can now be used to create physical models from virtually any scene on Proteopedia. This page provides an introduction to 3D printing, a guide to how to use Proteopedia to create printable files and tested printing profiles for common printers (i.e Prusa Research, BambuLab, Creality or Elegoo).

Let's 3D print the whole Proteopedia!

Introduction to 3D printing / 3D Printing 101

about printers (FDM vs SLA) single vs multimaterial and files

Overview of the 3D printing process

the path from structure/scene to physical object - including slicers and profiles

Generating printable files on Proteopedia

how to use the tool with screenshots, or maybe better, a movie?

Printing

This is where we provide printing profiles and instructions

Other relevant resources

References

  1. Howell ME, Booth CS, Sikich SM, Helikar T, van Dijk K, Roston RL, Couch BA. Interactive learning modules with 3D printed models improve student understanding of protein structure-function relationships. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020 Jul;48(4):356-368. PMID:32590880 doi:10.1002/bmb.21362
  2. Răzvan-Ştefan B, Laura Nicoleta P, Mihășan M. Impact of 3D-printed molecular models on student understanding of macromolecular structures: a compensatory research study. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2025 Jul-Aug;53(4):358-369. PMID:40214166 doi:10.1002/bmb.21902
  3. Smith DP. Active learning in the lecture theatre using 3D printed objects. F1000Res. 2016 Jan 13;5:61. PMID:27366318 doi:10.12688/f1000research.7632.2
  4. Srivastava A. Building mental models by dissecting physical models. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):7-11. PMID:26712513 doi:10.1002/bmb.20921
  5. Larsson, C., Tibell, L.A.E. Challenging Students’ Intuitions—the Influence of a Tangible Model of Virus Assembly on Students’ Conceptual Reasoning About the Process of Self-Assembly. Res Sci Educ 45, 663–690 (2015). DOI: 110.1007/s11165-014-9446-6
  6. Da Veiga Beltrame E, Tyrwhitt-Drake J, Roy I, Shalaby R, Suckale J, Pomeranz Krummel D. 3D Printing of Biomolecular Models for Research and Pedagogy. J Vis Exp. 2017 Mar 13;(121):55427. PMID:28362403 doi:10.3791/55427
  7. Mihasan M. A beginner's guideline for low-cost 3D printing of macromolecules usable for teaching and demonstration. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):521-528. PMID:33755300 doi:10.1002/bmb.21493
  8. Segarra VA, Chi RJ. Combining 3D-Printed Models and Open Source Molecular Modeling of p53 To Engage Students with Concepts in Cell Biology. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020 Dec 21;21(3):21.3.72. PMID:33384761 doi:10.1128/jmbe.v21i3.2161

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Marius Mihasan

Personal tools