User:Apolena Zounarová/Sandbox 2
From Proteopedia
< User:Apolena Zounarová(Difference between revisions)
| (21 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | == | + | ==NOTCH1 Heterodimerization Domain in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia== |
| - | <StructureSection load='3i08' size='340' side='right' caption=' | + | <StructureSection load='3i08' size='340' side='right' caption='NOTCH1 Heterodimerization Domain. Juxtamembrane peptide containing the S2 site in green, negative regulatory domain in blue.' scene=''> |
NOTCH1 is a member of NOTCH family receptor proteins which consists of four members (NOTCH1-4). NOTCH proteins are evolutionarily highly conserved signalling proteins responsible for direct transduction of developmental signals at the cell surface into change in a transcriptional profile in the nucleus. | NOTCH1 is a member of NOTCH family receptor proteins which consists of four members (NOTCH1-4). NOTCH proteins are evolutionarily highly conserved signalling proteins responsible for direct transduction of developmental signals at the cell surface into change in a transcriptional profile in the nucleus. | ||
| - | + | == Structure and Function of NOTCH1 == | |
| - | == Structure and Function of | + | |
NOTCH receptors are class I transmembrane glycoproteins composed of an extracellular subunit and transmembrane and intracellular subunit, which interact via a specialised heterodimerization domain (HD). The extracellular subunit engages ligand via several EGF-like repeats and further contains three LIN-12/NOTCH repeats (LNR) which stabilise the dimerization domain by holding the two NOTCH subunits together. The transmembrane-intracellular subunit contains a short extracellular juxtamembrane peptide, transmembrane sequence and cytoplasmic domains including RAM domain, nuclear localization signals (NLS), a series of ankyrin repeats, glutamine-rich region (OPA) and C-terminal PEST domain which serves as a ligand-activated transcription factor <ref name="aster">DOI 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154300</ref>. | NOTCH receptors are class I transmembrane glycoproteins composed of an extracellular subunit and transmembrane and intracellular subunit, which interact via a specialised heterodimerization domain (HD). The extracellular subunit engages ligand via several EGF-like repeats and further contains three LIN-12/NOTCH repeats (LNR) which stabilise the dimerization domain by holding the two NOTCH subunits together. The transmembrane-intracellular subunit contains a short extracellular juxtamembrane peptide, transmembrane sequence and cytoplasmic domains including RAM domain, nuclear localization signals (NLS), a series of ankyrin repeats, glutamine-rich region (OPA) and C-terminal PEST domain which serves as a ligand-activated transcription factor <ref name="aster">DOI 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154300</ref>. | ||
| - | === Proteolytic Events During | + | === Proteolytic Events During NOTCH1 Secretion and Signal Transduction === |
====Furin-type Convertase Cleavage==== | ====Furin-type Convertase Cleavage==== | ||
| - | + | NOTCH1 is posttranslationally modified by a proteolytic cleavage at S1 sites and reaches the plasma membrane as a heterodimer. Non-cleaved NOTCH1 is autoinhibited. Furin-type convertase is responsible for this process and cleaves NOTCH1 in at least two places: after R1633 and after R1664 <ref name="gordon">DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0006613</ref>. Both residues are located in a loop exposed into the cytosol and lie approximately 100 and 70 amino acids external from the transmembrane region, respectively <ref name="gordon" /><ref name="uniprot">DOI 10.1093/NAR/GKAA1100</ref>. | |
====Additional Cleavages in Response to Receptor Activation==== | ====Additional Cleavages in Response to Receptor Activation==== | ||
| - | Binding of | + | [[Image:Figure_Cleavage sites.png|350px|right|thumb| Schematic picture of NOTCH1 domains and cleavage sites with emphasis on regions contributing to the interaction between the two subunits.]]Binding of NOTCH1 ligands such as Delta1 or Jagged1 leads to the dissociation of the heterodimer. This structural change reveals S2 site for a cleavage by metalloprotease TNAα-converting enzyme (TACE), a member of a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain (ADAM) family, which then produces a fragment termed as NOTCH extracellular truncation (NEXT). S2 site is located between A1710 and V1711 in murine NOTCH1, 13 amino acids from the TM domain <ref name="brou">DOI 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80417-7</ref><ref name="mumm">DOI 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80416-5</ref>, which corresponds with positions 1720 and 1721 in human NOTCH1 <ref name="uniprot" />. The mechanism of ligand-induced dissociation can be explained by mechanical force caused by simultaneous endocytosis in the ligand cell. Thus, the events in the ligand cell are important for the NOTCH signal transduction as well. Since S2 cleavage is a ligand-regulated step, mutations in heterodimerization domain can mimic ligand-bound stage of the receptor and facilitate NOTCH proteolysis in a similar manner <ref name="nichols">DOI 10.1083/JCB.200609014</ref>. The cleavage by metalloprotease probably brings the receptor in a conformation similar to that of constitutively active receptors <ref name="brou" />. |
| - | Although the cleavage at S2 site is prominent for the activation of the | + | Although the cleavage at S2 site is prominent for the activation of the NOTCH pathway <ref name="brou" />, subsequent cleavage by γ-secretase presenilin at S3 site is the one which is responsible for NOTCH intracellular domain (NICD) production <ref name="destrooper">DOI 10.1038/19083</ref>. γ-secretase cleaves murine NOTCH1 between G1743 and V1744 <ref name="schroeter">DOI 10.1038/30756</ref>, which is G1753 and V1754 in human NOTCH1 <ref name="uniprot" />. The same enzymatic activity creates Aβ peptide in Alzheimer‘s disease from β-APP precursor <ref name="destrooper" />. |
===Heterodimerization Domain and Negative Regulatory Region=== | ===Heterodimerization Domain and Negative Regulatory Region=== | ||
| - | Stable association of the two | + | [[Image:Figure Interface.png|350px|left|thumb|Interface between the LNR and HD domains. (A) LNR-HD contact interface. LNR domain surface coloured pink when the atom approaches within 4Å of the HD domain, otherwise coloured light pink. HD domain surface is coloured teal when the atom approaches within 4 A˚ of the LNR domain, otherwise light cyan. (B) Contacts with LNR including conserved hydrogen bond anchor helix 3 above S2 site. (C) The LNR-AB linker sterically blocks access to the S2 site. Hydrophobic pocket in HD domain houses the S2 site and residues from the LNR-AB linker (in ball-and-stick form).Three ‘gatekeeper residues’ from LNR-AB linker shown as a pink surface. <ref name="gordon2">DOI 10.1038/nsmb1227</ref>]]Stable association of the two NOTCH1 chains depends on the heterodimerization domain which consists of two regions. 65 amino acid C-terminal region (HD-C, NTM) remains associated with the transmembrane part of the receptor, whereas 103 aminoacid extracellular N-terminal region (HD-N, NEC) has been separated by furin-type convertase and interacts with the membrane-bound part non-covalently. Adjacent to HD-N are three LIN-12/NOTCH repeats (LNR) which are not necessary for heterodimerization, but rather protect HD-C from metalloprotease cleavage and prevent ligand-independent activation of the signalling pathway. LNR are together with HD-N termed as the negative regulatory region, NRR <ref name="sanchez">DOI 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9265-9273.2004</ref>. |
| - | + | NOTCH mutants with deleted extracellular domain are constitutively active and are cleaved at the S3 site in a constitutive manner. Also, their activity is equivalent to NOTCH mutants containing the intracellular part only. This observation supports the idea that the conformation of the receptor is important for the changes in accessibility of S3 site. Ligand binding can change the conformation and permits cleavage of NOTCH by γ-secretase either directly or indirectly. On the contrary, constructs bearing also LNR are neither constitutively active nor constitutively cleaved <ref name="kopan">DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1683</ref>. | |
== T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia == | == T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia == | ||
| + | T-cell-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive hematologic tumor that predominantly affects children and adolescents. T-ALL is more prevalent in males. T-ALL is manifested by malignant differentiation of the multipotent precursor cells of the lymphoid lineage which lost their ability to mature and became the leukemic blasts infiltrating bone marrow. T-ALL overall has a poor prognosis, 5-year relapse-free survival rate is over 75 % in children and 50 % in adults <ref name="pui">DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2</ref>. | ||
| + | The importance of NOTCH1 mutations in T-ALL has been shown by Weng and colleagues <ref name="weng">DOI 10.1126/science.1102160</ref>. 44 % of NOTCH-dependent T-ALL cell lines harboured gain-of-function mutations in the heterodimerization domain. Moreover, about 40 % of these cases were accompanied by mutations in the intracellular PEST domain of NOTCH1 which is important for the signal termination <ref name="sundaram">PMID: 8293978</ref>. Weng and colleagues proposed a model of synergy in which mutations in the heterodimerization domain increase the production of NICD by γ-secretase cleavage while mutations in intracellular PEST domain increases its half-life. Cell lines with mutations in the heterodimerization domain are sensitive to γ-secretase inhibitors and exhibit G0/G1 cell cycle arrest opposed to PEST domain mutants which are unaffected by the inhibitor <ref name="weng" />. Common mutations found in human T-ALL and acting in γ-secretase-dependent manner are L1575P, L1594P, and L1601P <ref name="malecki">DOI 10.1128/MCB.01655-05</ref><ref name="weng" />. | ||
| + | ===Mutations in Heterodimerization Domain=== | ||
| + | [[Image:HD dom mut.jpg|433px|left|thumb|T-ALL tumor associated mutations in Notch1 NRR. (A) Structural representation highlighting T-ALL mutations. Side chains of residues mutated in T-ALL patients are shown in ball-and-stick form. Residues are colored according to mutation site: core (green), interface (orange), or partially exposed (purple). (B) Close-up view of mutations in the HD domain.]] | ||
| + | Activating mutations in the heterodimerization domain are predominantly missense mutations at sites which are conserved among vertebrate NOTCH receptors or small in-frame insertions and deletions. As a consequence, mutated receptors are activated regardless of the binding of a ligand <ref name="malecki" /><ref name="weng" />. The mutation hotspot is the region between residues 1574 and 1622 of the N-terminal portion of the heterodimerization domain which contains several highly conserved hydrophobic residues including a cluster of aliphatic amino acids. In this region are located activating mutations such as L1575P, L1594P, or L1601P which can increase the transcription from 3- to 9-fold <ref name="weng" />. However, some similar missense mutations in invariant amino acids can be also found in the C-terminal part of the heterodimerization domain <ref name="malecki" /><ref name="weng" />. Abovementioned mutations cause heterodimers to dissociate more readily. Among the mutations with the strongest effect on the heterodimer dissociation are L1601P, V1677D, and L1679P which induce dissociation of most or almost all furin-processed heterodimers into two subunits (the latter two mutations are in HD-C) <ref name="malecki" />. The effect of these mutations can be explained from the structural properties of interacting chains which are forming antiparallel beta sheets followed by an alpha helix. Especially in case of a strong secondary structure breaker such as proline, this interaction can be impaired <ref name="pdb3i08">DOI 10.2210/pdb3I08/pdb</ref>. Besides that, NOTCH can be also activated by insertions. One mutation identified by Malecki and colleagues was a 16 amino acid long insertion which had negligible effect on heterodimer stability, but probably changed the relative position of S2 site in respect to the protective part of NOTCH <ref name="malecki" />. | ||
| + | [[Image:Beta_sheets_zoom.png|250px|left|thumb| Antiparallel beta sheets formed by both subunits together. S2 site is in red.]] | ||
| - | == | + | Aberrant proteolytic processing can be also triggered by changes in spacing of the heterodimerization domain from the plasma membrane. These mutations are called juxtamembrane expansion (JME) alleles. These mutations are duplication insertions in the vicinity of the extracellular juxtamembrane region of the receptor and they depend more on the size of insertion than on the specific amino acid sequence. Insertions are clustered around position 1740 and range from 11 to 36 amino acids <ref name="sulis">DOI 10.1182/BLOOD-2007-12-130096</ref>. |
| + | Some of the mutations such as L1601P and F1593S can affect furin cleavage. This might be caused by a retention of newly synthesised NOTCH in endoplasmic reticulum due to possible changes in folding, and recognition by ER-resident quality control mechanism <ref name="malecki" />. | ||
| - | == Structural highlights == | ||
| - | This is a sample scene created with SAT to <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/1">color</scene> by Group, and another to make <scene name="/12/3456/Sample/2">a transparent representation</scene> of the protein. You can make your own scenes on SAT starting from scratch or loading and editing one of these sample scenes. | ||
| - | From intro. This is a default text for your page '''Apolena Zounarová/Sandbox 1'''. Click above on '''edit this page''' to modify. Be careful with the < and > signs. | ||
| - | You may include any references to papers as in: the use of JSmol in Proteopedia <ref>DOI 10.1002/ijch.201300024</ref> or to the article describing Jmol <ref>PMID:21638687</ref> to the rescue. | ||
| + | == Relevance == | ||
| + | ===NOTCH1 Role in Normal T-cell Development=== | ||
| + | In hematopoietic system NOTCH1 plays a key role in T-cell development. NOTCH1 supports cell growth, proliferation and survival at multiple stages of thymocyte development. NOTCH1 activation drives multipotent progenitor cell towards T-cell lineage. NOTCH1 inhibition leads to ectopic differentiation of immature B-cells in thymus <ref name="han">DOI 10.1093/intimm/dxf030</ref>. NOTCH1 is also involved in progression through double-negative stages in thymocytes development <ref name="schmitt">DOI 10.1084/jem.20040394</ref> and has an important role in rearrangement of T-cell receptors and decision whether γδTCR or αβTCR lineage will be developed <ref name="washburn">DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81929-7</ref>. | ||
| + | ===NOTCH1 as a Therapeutic Target=== | ||
| + | The central role of NOTCH1 in T-cell signalling and high prevalence of NOTCH1 mutations in T-ALL cases led to targeting NOTCH1 in T-ALL therapy. The main approach to blocking NOTCH1 signalling is targeting γ-secretase that is essential for NOTCH1 signalling. γ-secreatase inhibitors (GSIs) reduce the production of Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and downregulate transcription of proteins promoting leukemic cell growth <ref name="palomero2006a">DOI 10.1038/sj.leu.2404258</ref>. Antileukemic effects of GSIs were shown in vitro using γ-secretase inhibitor Compound E <ref name="palomero2006b">DOI 10.1073/pnas.0606108103</ref> and in vivo in a mouse model <ref name="cullion">DOI 10.1182/blood-2008-02-136762</ref>. | ||
| + | GSIs treatment as a side effect causes intestinal toxicity, because NOTCH1 plays an important role in intestinal stem cells. The side effects manifest in malabsorption and intestinal secretory cells metaplasia and accumulation of goblet cells <ref name="riccio">DOI 10.1038/embor.2008.7</ref>. | ||
| + | It was shown in vitro that some T-ALL cases are resistant to NOTCH1 inhibition with GSIs. This is in some cases associated with constitutive activation of the PI3K-PTEN pathway <ref name="palomero2007">DOI 10.1038/nm1636</ref> or with further mutations, such as FBXW7 (mutation in F-box protein) <ref name="oneil">DOI 10.1084/jem.20070876</ref>. | ||
| + | More recent approach uses specific antibodies against NOTCH proteins.These antibodies bind to the HD domain of NOTCH and thus inhibit signalization. The inhibition effect on tumor growth was shown in vitro and in vivo <ref name="wu">DOI 10.1038/nature08878</ref><ref name="zhang">DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009094</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Structural Highlights == | ||
| + | Majority of T-ALL-associated mutations is located in the region where C-terminal part of the Negative Regulatory Region (HD-N) interacts with the juxtamembrane peptide (HD-C) by forming antiparalel beta sheets, or in a proximal alpha helix on the HD-N chain. Disruptions in this structure may loosen the interaction and lead to dissociation of the subunits and aberrant signalling. | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Current revision
NOTCH1 Heterodimerization Domain in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
| |||||||||||
References
- ↑ Aster JC, Pear WS, Blacklow SC. Notch signaling in leukemia. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:587-613. doi:, 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154300. PMID:18039126 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154300
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Gordon WR, Vardar-Ulu D, L'Heureux S, Ashworth T, Malecki MJ, Sanchez-Irizarry C, McArthur DG, Histen G, Mitchell JL, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Effects of S1 cleavage on the structure, surface export, and signaling activity of human Notch1 and Notch2. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 24;4(8):e6613. PMID:19701457 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006613
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 . UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D480-D489. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100. PMID:33237286 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Brou C, Logeat F, Gupta N, Bessia C, LeBail O, Doedens JR, Cumano A, Roux P, Black RA, Israel A. A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: the role of the disintegrin-metalloprotease TACE. Mol Cell. 2000 Feb;5(2):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80417-7. PMID:10882063 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80417-7
- ↑ Mumm JS, Schroeter EH, Saxena MT, Griesemer A, Tian X, Pan DJ, Ray WJ, Kopan R. A ligand-induced extracellular cleavage regulates gamma-secretase-like proteolytic activation of Notch1. Mol Cell. 2000 Feb;5(2):197-206. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80416-5. PMID:10882062 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80416-5
- ↑ Nichols JT, Miyamoto A, Olsen SL, D'Souza B, Yao C, Weinmaster G. DSL ligand endocytosis physically dissociates Notch1 heterodimers before activating proteolysis can occur. J Cell Biol. 2007 Feb 12;176(4):445-58. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200609014. PMID:17296795 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200609014
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 De Strooper B, Annaert W, Cupers P, Saftig P, Craessaerts K, Mumm JS, Schroeter EH, Schrijvers V, Wolfe MS, Ray WJ, Goate A, Kopan R. A presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature. 1999 Apr 8;398(6727):518-22. doi: 10.1038/19083. PMID:10206645 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/19083
- ↑ Schroeter EH, Kisslinger JA, Kopan R. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature. 1998 May 28;393(6683):382-6. doi: 10.1038/30756. PMID:9620803 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30756
- ↑ Gordon WR, Vardar-Ulu D, Histen G, Sanchez-Irizarry C, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Structural basis for autoinhibition of Notch. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007 Apr;14(4):295-300. Epub 2007 Apr 1. PMID:17401372 doi:10.1038/nsmb1227
- ↑ Sanchez-Irizarry C, Carpenter AC, Weng AP, Pear WS, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Notch subunit heterodimerization and prevention of ligand-independent proteolytic activation depend, respectively, on a novel domain and the LNR repeats. Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Nov;24(21):9265-73. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9265-9273.2004. PMID:15485896 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9265-9273.2004
- ↑ Kopan R, Schroeter EH, Weintraub H, Nye JS. Signal transduction by activated mNotch: importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 20;93(4):1683-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1683. PMID:8643690 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.4.1683
- ↑ Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):1030-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2. PMID:18358930 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60457-2
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JP 4th, Silverman LB, Sanchez-Irizarry C, Blacklow SC, Look AT, Aster JC. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science. 2004 Oct 8;306(5694):269-71. doi: 10.1126/science.1102160. PMID:15472075 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1102160
- ↑ Sundaram M, Greenwald I. Suppressors of a lin-12 hypomorph define genes that interact with both lin-12 and glp-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1993 Nov;135(3):765-83. PMID:8293978
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 Malecki MJ, Sanchez-Irizarry C, Mitchell JL, Histen G, Xu ML, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Leukemia-associated mutations within the NOTCH1 heterodimerization domain fall into at least two distinct mechanistic classes. Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jun;26(12):4642-51. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01655-05. PMID:16738328 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01655-05
- ↑ doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb3I08/pdb
- ↑ Sulis ML, Williams O, Palomero T, Tosello V, Pallikuppam S, Real PJ, Barnes K, Zuurbier L, Meijerink JP, Ferrando AA. NOTCH1 extracellular juxtamembrane expansion mutations in T-ALL. Blood. 2008 Aug 1;112(3):733-40. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-130096. Epub 2008 Apr, 14. PMID:18411416 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-12-130096
- ↑ Han H, Tanigaki K, Yamamoto N, Kuroda K, Yoshimoto M, Nakahata T, Ikuta K, Honjo T. Inducible gene knockout of transcription factor recombination signal binding protein-J reveals its essential role in T versus B lineage decision. Int Immunol. 2002 Jun;14(6):637-45. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxf030. PMID:12039915 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxf030
- ↑ Schmitt TM, Ciofani M, Petrie HT, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Maintenance of T cell specification and differentiation requires recurrent notch receptor-ligand interactions. J Exp Med. 2004 Aug 16;200(4):469-79. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040394. PMID:15314075 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040394
- ↑ Washburn T, Schweighoffer E, Gridley T, Chang D, Fowlkes BJ, Cado D, Robey E. Notch activity influences the alphabeta versus gammadelta T cell lineage decision. Cell. 1997 Mar 21;88(6):833-43. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81929-7. PMID:9118226 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81929-7
- ↑ Palomero T, Barnes KC, Real PJ, Glade Bender JL, Sulis ML, Murty VV, Colovai AI, Balbin M, Ferrando AA. CUTLL1, a novel human T-cell lymphoma cell line with t(7;9) rearrangement, aberrant NOTCH1 activation and high sensitivity to gamma-secretase inhibitors. Leukemia. 2006 Jul;20(7):1279-87. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404258. Epub 2006 May 11. PMID:16688224 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404258
- ↑ Palomero T, Lim WK, Odom DT, Sulis ML, Real PJ, Margolin A, Barnes KC, O'Neil J, Neuberg D, Weng AP, Aster JC, Sigaux F, Soulier J, Look AT, Young RA, Califano A, Ferrando AA. NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 28;103(48):18261-6. doi:, 10.1073/pnas.0606108103. Epub 2006 Nov 17. PMID:17114293 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606108103
- ↑ Cullion K, Draheim KM, Hermance N, Tammam J, Sharma VM, Ware C, Nikov G, Krishnamoorthy V, Majumder PK, Kelliher MA. Targeting the Notch1 and mTOR pathways in a mouse T-ALL model. Blood. 2009 Jun 11;113(24):6172-81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-136762. Epub 2009 , Feb 26. PMID:19246562 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-02-136762
- ↑ Riccio O, van Gijn ME, Bezdek AC, Pellegrinet L, van Es JH, Zimber-Strobl U, Strobl LJ, Honjo T, Clevers H, Radtke F. Loss of intestinal crypt progenitor cells owing to inactivation of both Notch1 and Notch2 is accompanied by derepression of CDK inhibitors p27Kip1 and p57Kip2. EMBO Rep. 2008 Apr;9(4):377-83. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.7. Epub 2008 Feb 15. PMID:18274550 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.7
- ↑ Palomero T, Sulis ML, Cortina M, Real PJ, Barnes K, Ciofani M, Caparros E, Buteau J, Brown K, Perkins SL, Bhagat G, Agarwal AM, Basso G, Castillo M, Nagase S, Cordon-Cardo C, Parsons R, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Dominguez M, Ferrando AA. Mutational loss of PTEN induces resistance to NOTCH1 inhibition in T-cell leukemia. Nat Med. 2007 Oct;13(10):1203-10. doi: 10.1038/nm1636. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID:17873882 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1636
- ↑ O'Neil J, Grim J, Strack P, Rao S, Tibbitts D, Winter C, Hardwick J, Welcker M, Meijerink JP, Pieters R, Draetta G, Sears R, Clurman BE, Look AT. FBW7 mutations in leukemic cells mediate NOTCH pathway activation and resistance to gamma-secretase inhibitors. J Exp Med. 2007 Aug 6;204(8):1813-24. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070876. Epub 2007 Jul, 23. PMID:17646409 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070876
- ↑ Wu Y, Cain-Hom C, Choy L, Hagenbeek TJ, de Leon GP, Chen Y, Finkle D, Venook R, Wu X, Ridgway J, Schahin-Reed D, Dow GJ, Shelton A, Stawicki S, Watts RJ, Zhang J, Choy R, Howard P, Kadyk L, Yan M, Zha J, Callahan CA, Hymowitz SG, Siebel CW. Therapeutic antibody targeting of individual Notch receptors. Nature. 2010 Apr 15;464(7291):1052-7. PMID:20393564 doi:10.1038/nature08878
- ↑ Aste-Amezaga M, Zhang N, Lineberger JE, Arnold BA, Toner TJ, Gu M, Huang L, Vitelli S, Vo KT, Haytko P, Zhao JZ, Baleydier F, L'Heureux S, Wang H, Gordon WR, Thoryk E, Andrawes MB, Tiyanont K, Stegmaier K, Roti G, Ross KN, Franlin LL, Wang H, Wang F, Chastain M, Bett AJ, Audoly LP, Aster JC, Blacklow SC, Huber HE. Characterization of Notch1 antibodies that inhibit signaling of both normal and mutated Notch1 receptors. PLoS One. 2010 Feb 8;5(2):e9094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009094. PMID:20161710 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009094

