Sandbox Reserved 1172
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
- | Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 (commonly referred to as LPA<sub>1</sub>) is a [[G protein-coupled receptor]] and one of 6 different LPA receptors (LPA<sub>1</sub>-LPA<sub>6</sub>) that | + | Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 (commonly referred to as LPA<sub>1</sub>) is a [[G protein-coupled receptor]] and one of 6 different LPA receptors (LPA<sub>1</sub>-LPA<sub>6</sub>) that binds the phospholipid derivative [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysophosphatidic_acid lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)], a signaling molecule that acts as a potent [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitogen mitogen] upon binding to one of its six receptors.<ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref> LPA<sub>1</sub> is part of the larger [http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/131/6/767 EDG receptor family] which includes the more widely known sphingosine 1-phopshate receptors. |
== Structure == | == Structure == | ||
[[Image:ABP.png|250 px|left|thumb|Electrostatic illustration of the amphipathic binding pocket of the LPA<sub>1</sub> receptor.]] | [[Image:ABP.png|250 px|left|thumb|Electrostatic illustration of the amphipathic binding pocket of the LPA<sub>1</sub> receptor.]] | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=== Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor === | === Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor === | ||
- | LPA<sub>1</sub> belongs to the EDG (endothelial differentiation gene) family of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysophospholipid_receptor lysophospholipid receptors]. This family also includes the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S1PR1 sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1] (S1P<sub>1</sub>), which has many structural similarities to LPA<sub>1</sub>. In fact, the transmembrane regions share a sequence identity of 41%. A defining difference between these two receptors is their mode of ligand access to the binding site. Where as the hydrophobic [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphingosine-1-phosphate S1P ligand] enters S1P<sub>1</sub> via the membrane, LPA<sub>1</sub> has an extracellular opening that allows LPA access from the extracellular space <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. Structural evidence for this altered ligand pathway include global changes in the positioning of the extracellular loops (ECL) and transmembrane helices (TM). Specifically, this includes slight divergence of <scene name='72/721543/Tmvii_and_tmi/1'>TMI</scene>, which is positioned 3 angstroms closer to TMVII compared to S1P<sub>1</sub>, and a repositioning of <scene name='72/721543/Ecl_regions/1'>ECL3</scene>, resulting in a divergence of 8 angstroms from S1P<sub>1</sub> <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. This narrowing of the gap between TMI and TMVII blocks membrane ligand access, while the greater distance between ECL3 and the other extracellular loops promotes extracellular access. Additionally, ECL0 is helical in S1P<sub>1</sub>, but lacks secondary structure in LPA<sub>1</sub>. This increased flexibility that results further promotes favorable access from the extracellular space <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. | + | LPA<sub>1</sub> belongs to the EDG (endothelial differentiation gene) family of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysophospholipid_receptor lysophospholipid receptors]. This family also includes the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S1PR1 sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1] (S1P<sub>1</sub>), which has many structural similarities to LPA<sub>1</sub>. In fact, the transmembrane regions share a sequence identity of 41%. <ref name = 'Chun, E.'>Chun, E., Thompson, A.A., Lui, W., Roth, C.B., Griffith, M.T., Katritch, V., Kunken, J., Xu, F., Cherezov, V., Hanson, M.A., and Stevens, R.C. “Fusion partner tool chest for the stabilization and crystallization of G protein-coupled receptors.” Structure 20, (2012) 967-976.' </ref> A defining difference between these two receptors is their mode of ligand access to the binding site. Where as the hydrophobic [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphingosine-1-phosphate S1P ligand] enters S1P<sub>1</sub> via the membrane, LPA<sub>1</sub> has an extracellular opening that allows LPA access from the extracellular space <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. Structural evidence for this altered ligand pathway include global changes in the positioning of the extracellular loops (ECL) and transmembrane helices (TM). Specifically, this includes slight divergence of <scene name='72/721543/Tmvii_and_tmi/1'>TMI</scene>, which is positioned 3 angstroms closer to TMVII compared to S1P<sub>1</sub>, and a repositioning of <scene name='72/721543/Ecl_regions/1'>ECL3</scene>, resulting in a divergence of 8 angstroms from S1P<sub>1</sub> <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. This narrowing of the gap between TMI and TMVII blocks membrane ligand access, while the greater distance between ECL3 and the other extracellular loops promotes extracellular access for LPA<sub>1</sub>. Additionally, ECL0 is helical in S1P<sub>1</sub>, but lacks secondary structure in LPA<sub>1</sub>. This increased flexibility that results further promotes favorable access from the extracellular space <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. |
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
LPA<sub>1</sub> also is closely related to the [http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v30/n1s/full/0803272a.html cannabinoid receptor]. This close relation gives CB<sub>1</sub> ([[Cannabinoid Receptor 1]]) the ability to bind to analogs of LPA and vice versa, which opens the possibility of metabolic crosstalk between the two signaling systems. This connection is made possible through ligand phosphorylation and dephosphorylation <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. Specifically, complementary access to the LPA<sub>1</sub> binding pocket can be achieved by phosphorylated CB<sub>1</sub> ligand analogs, while complementary access to the CB<sub>1</sub> binding site requires dephosphorylation of LPA<sub>1</sub> ligand analogs. In both cases, a ligand could serve as a primary [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_receptor_modulator receptor modulator] and a simultaneous [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodrug prodrug] for a different receptor <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. | LPA<sub>1</sub> also is closely related to the [http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v30/n1s/full/0803272a.html cannabinoid receptor]. This close relation gives CB<sub>1</sub> ([[Cannabinoid Receptor 1]]) the ability to bind to analogs of LPA and vice versa, which opens the possibility of metabolic crosstalk between the two signaling systems. This connection is made possible through ligand phosphorylation and dephosphorylation <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. Specifically, complementary access to the LPA<sub>1</sub> binding pocket can be achieved by phosphorylated CB<sub>1</sub> ligand analogs, while complementary access to the CB<sub>1</sub> binding site requires dephosphorylation of LPA<sub>1</sub> ligand analogs. In both cases, a ligand could serve as a primary [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_receptor_modulator receptor modulator] and a simultaneous [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodrug prodrug] for a different receptor <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref>. | ||
- | <scene name='72/721543/Asp129_and_trp210/2'>Residues Asp129 and Trp210</scene> located within the hydrophobic binding pocket of LPA<sub>1</sub> may share responsibility for the preference for long unsaturated acyl chains. These residues are also interesting in regard to GPCR phylogenic evolution | + | <scene name='72/721543/Asp129_and_trp210/2'>Residues Asp129 and Trp210</scene> located within the hydrophobic binding pocket of LPA<sub>1</sub> may share responsibility for the preference for long unsaturated acyl chains. These residues are also interesting in regard to GPCR phylogenic evolution. <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref> Trp210 specifically only occurs in this position in 1% of all class A GPCR receptors and is unique to lysophospholipid and cannabinoid receptors. <ref name = 'Van Durme'>Van Durme, J., Horn, F., Costagliola, S., Vriend, G., and Vassart, G. “GRIS: glycoprotein-hormone receptor information system.” Mol. (2006) Endocrinol. 20, 2247-2255' </ref> |
- | A model for lipid agonist binding generated through molecular modeling was used to dock two of the cannabinoid receptor CB<sub>1</sub>'s most abundant endogenous ligands into the LPA<sub>1</sub> binding pocket <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref> | + | A model for lipid agonist binding generated through molecular modeling was used to dock two of the cannabinoid receptor CB<sub>1</sub>'s most abundant endogenous ligands into the LPA<sub>1</sub> binding pocket. <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref> Rotameric shifts of Trp210 and Trp271 leading to expansion of the binding pocket and the exposure of the π clouds of their indole rings provided favorable interactions with the double bonds of the phosphorylated cannabinoid ligands. This favorable binding provides evidence that the hydrophobic binding pockets of LPA<sub>1</sub> and CB<sub>1</sub> are able to favorably bind the same poly-unsaturated acyl chains with metabolically interconvertible head groups. <ref name="regpeps">PMID: 26091040</ref> |
Revision as of 19:01, 30 March 2016
This Sandbox is Reserved from Jan 11 through August 12, 2016 for use in the course CH462 Central Metabolism taught by R. Jeremy Johnson at the Butler University, Indianapolis, USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1160 through Sandbox Reserved 1184. |
To get started:
More help: Help:Editing |
Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1
References
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 Chrencik JE, Roth CB, Terakado M, Kurata H, Omi R, Kihara Y, Warshaviak D, Nakade S, Asmar-Rovira G, Mileni M, Mizuno H, Griffith MT, Rodgers C, Han GW, Velasquez J, Chun J, Stevens RC, Hanson MA. Crystal Structure of Antagonist Bound Human Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1. Cell. 2015 Jun 18;161(7):1633-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.002. PMID:26091040 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.002
- ↑ Hernández-Méndez, Aurelio, Rocío Alcántara-Hernández, and J. Adolfo García-Sáinz. "Lysophosphatidic Acid LPA1-3 Receptors: Signaling, Regulation and in Silico Analysis of Their Putative Phosphorylation Sites." Receptors & Clinical Investigation Receptor Clin Invest 1.3 (2014). Web. 15 Feb. 2016.'
- ↑ Yung, Y. C., N. C. Stoddard, and J. Chun. "LPA Receptor Signaling: Pharmacology, Physiology, and Pathophysiology." The Journal of Lipid Research 55.7 (2014): 1192-214. Web. 17 Feb. 2016.'
- ↑ Chun, J., Hla, T., Spiegel, S., and Moolenaar, W.H. “Lysophospholipid Receptors: Signaling and Biochemistry.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013) pp.i-xviii. 5 Feb. 2016.'
- ↑ Anliker B, Choi JW, Lin ME, Gardell SE, Rivera RR, Kennedy G, Chun J. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and its receptor, LPA1 , influence embryonic schwann cell migration, myelination, and cell-to-axon segregation. Glia. 2013 Dec;61(12):2009-22. doi: 10.1002/glia.22572. Epub 2013 Sep 24. PMID:24115248 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/glia.22572
- ↑ Lin ME, Herr DR, Chun J. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors: signaling properties and disease relevance. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2010 Apr;91(3-4):130-8. doi:, 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 4. PMID:20331961 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2009.02.002
- ↑ Justus CR, Dong L, Yang LV. Acidic tumor microenvironment and pH-sensing G protein-coupled receptors. Front Physiol. 2013 Dec 5;4:354. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00354. PMID:24367336 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00354
- ↑ Chun, E., Thompson, A.A., Lui, W., Roth, C.B., Griffith, M.T., Katritch, V., Kunken, J., Xu, F., Cherezov, V., Hanson, M.A., and Stevens, R.C. “Fusion partner tool chest for the stabilization and crystallization of G protein-coupled receptors.” Structure 20, (2012) 967-976.'
- ↑ Van Durme, J., Horn, F., Costagliola, S., Vriend, G., and Vassart, G. “GRIS: glycoprotein-hormone receptor information system.” Mol. (2006) Endocrinol. 20, 2247-2255'