Lauren Ferris/Sandbox 2

From Proteopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 186: Line 186:
It has been hypothesized that the most recent crystal structure of DdrB and ssDNA does not fully depict the ssDNA/DdrB interaction. <ref>PMID: 23975200 </ref> This idea is thought because the positively charged track (see above) on the surface of one side of the DdrB protein is not utilized in this crystal structure. It is possible that the DNA binds to this positive track and then proceeds through the DNA channel formed by the pentamers. This is not unreasonable, as the crystal structure for uracil-DNA glycosylase failed to reveal an additional binding surface – that was later detected. <ref>PMID: 22492624 </ref> Given the new-found role of DdrB in facilitating ssDNA strand annealing, it did not seem likely that the ssDNA channel revealed in the crystal structure could support this function. Therefore, DdrB mutants were generated that altered the positive track and ssDNA binding was tested. This experiment showed that the mutants could not bind ssDNA as well, suggesting that this surface area is involved in ssDNA binding. <ref>PMID: 23975200 </ref>
It has been hypothesized that the most recent crystal structure of DdrB and ssDNA does not fully depict the ssDNA/DdrB interaction. <ref>PMID: 23975200 </ref> This idea is thought because the positively charged track (see above) on the surface of one side of the DdrB protein is not utilized in this crystal structure. It is possible that the DNA binds to this positive track and then proceeds through the DNA channel formed by the pentamers. This is not unreasonable, as the crystal structure for uracil-DNA glycosylase failed to reveal an additional binding surface – that was later detected. <ref>PMID: 22492624 </ref> Given the new-found role of DdrB in facilitating ssDNA strand annealing, it did not seem likely that the ssDNA channel revealed in the crystal structure could support this function. Therefore, DdrB mutants were generated that altered the positive track and ssDNA binding was tested. This experiment showed that the mutants could not bind ssDNA as well, suggesting that this surface area is involved in ssDNA binding. <ref>PMID: 23975200 </ref>
-
Studies have suggested that the binding stoichiometry between ssDNA and DdrB is about 41 to 56 nucleotides per pentamer. <ref>PMID:21968057</ref> Given this finding and what is known about the protein from the crystal structures, it would seem reasonable that the ssDNA would associate with both the DNA channel and positive track on the surface of DdrB. The simplest reconciliation of these factors is displayed on the left side of the figure, where two ssDNA strands associate with DdrB via different clefts in the top pentamer and annealing occurs as a result of the positioning of two ssDNA strands. <ref>PMID: 23975200</ref> Another "simple" model proposed, is that the nucleotide bases are positioned away from the pentamer when a ssDNA molecule binds to DdrB <ref>PMID: 23975200</ref>. (As nucleotide bases have adapted this turned out structure in Rad52 <ref>PMID: 12370410</ref>) Annealing would then be driven by the association of two pentamer-pentamers. In either case, thermodynamics would drive the formation of the duplex.<ref>PMID: 23975200</ref>
 
-
It is also possible that more complex ssDNA/DdrB conformations are required for functionality.
 
[[Image:models.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Potential Mechanisms for DdrB mediated ssDNA annealing as proposed by Sugiman-Marangos et al. (PDB: [[4HQB]] This figure was generated using Pymol.]]
[[Image:models.jpg|300px|left|thumb|Potential Mechanisms for DdrB mediated ssDNA annealing as proposed by Sugiman-Marangos et al. (PDB: [[4HQB]] This figure was generated using Pymol.]]
 +
 +
Studies have suggested that the binding stoichiometry between ssDNA and DdrB is about 41 to 56 nucleotides per pentamer. <ref>PMID:21968057</ref> Given this finding and what is known about the protein from the crystal structures, it would seem reasonable that the ssDNA would associate with both the DNA channel and positive track on the surface of DdrB. The simplest reconciliation of these factors is displayed on the left side of the figure, where two ssDNA strands associate with DdrB via different clefts in the top pentamer and annealing occurs as a result of the positioning of two ssDNA strands. <ref>PMID: 23975200</ref> Another "simple" model proposed, is that the nucleotide bases are positioned away from the pentamer when a ssDNA molecule binds to DdrB <ref>PMID: 23975200</ref>. (As nucleotide bases have adapted this turned out structure in Rad52 <ref>PMID: 12370410</ref>) Annealing would then be driven by the association of two pentamer-pentamers. In either case, thermodynamics would drive the formation of the duplex.<ref>PMID: 23975200</ref>
 +
 +
It is also possible that more complex ssDNA/DdrB conformations are required for functionality.

Revision as of 14:32, 30 April 2014

DdrB

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Lauren Ferris

Personal tools