Sandbox Reserved 1700
From Proteopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=== G-Protein === | === G-Protein === | ||
- | [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/G_protein GTP-binding proteins], also known as G-proteins, are heterotrimeric complexes consisting of <scene name=''90/904305/Structure_overview_alpha/2'>alpha</scene>, <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_beta/2'>beta</scene>, and <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_gamma/2'>gamma</scene> subunits that interact with the intracellular transmembrane region at an <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/1'>interface</scene> ( '''Figure 2b'''). G-proteins are responsible for transmitting extracellular signals into the cell upon activation. Activation leads to a substitution of GDP with GTP within the alpha subunit, causing the alpha subunit to disassociate from the beta and gamma subunits to initiate an intracellular signaling cascade. There are different families of G-alpha subunits, Gαi, Gαs, Gα12/13, and Gαq <ref name="Kamato">PMID: 26664886</ref>. MRGPRX2 binds to both Gαi and Gαq subunits with nearly identical structures despite slightly different amino acids present ( '''Figure 2a''') <ref name= "Cao" /> <ref name= "Yang" />. Throughout this page, MGPRX2 is always shown with Gq. The major difference between the Gq and Gi bound structures comes from one amino acid difference (valine on Gq versus phenylalanine on Gi) that pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. | + | [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/G_protein GTP-binding proteins], also known as G-proteins, are heterotrimeric complexes consisting of <scene name=''90/904305/Structure_overview_alpha/2'>alpha</scene>, <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_beta/2'>beta</scene>, and <scene name='90/904305/Structure_overview_gamma/2'>gamma</scene> subunits that interact with the intracellular transmembrane region at an <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/1'>interface</scene> ( '''Figure 2b'''). G-proteins are responsible for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_transduction transmitting] extracellular signals into the cell upon activation. Activation leads to a substitution of GDP with GTP within the alpha subunit, causing the alpha subunit to disassociate from the beta and gamma subunits to initiate an intracellular signaling cascade. There are different families of G-alpha subunits, Gαi, Gαs, Gα12/13, and Gαq <ref name="Kamato">PMID: 26664886</ref>. MRGPRX2 binds to both Gαi and Gαq subunits with nearly identical structures despite slightly different amino acids present ( '''Figure 2a''') <ref name= "Cao" /> <ref name= "Yang" />. Throughout this page, MGPRX2 is always shown with Gq. The major difference between the Gq and Gi bound structures comes from one amino acid difference (valine on Gq versus phenylalanine on Gi) that pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. |
[[Image:Gq and gi overlay.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2a.''' Overlay of MGPRX2-Gq (red-dark blue) and MGPRX2-Gi (cyan-yellow). '''Figure 2b.''' Important residues involved in the interface between MGPRX2 and Gq/ Gi subunits. Arrow pointing to the major difference between the interfaces, which comes from the final C-terminus residue on the G-alpha subunit. In Gq, there is a valine while in Gi, there is a phenylalanine. This pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. All other interactions are nearly identical.]] | [[Image:Gq and gi overlay.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 2a.''' Overlay of MGPRX2-Gq (red-dark blue) and MGPRX2-Gi (cyan-yellow). '''Figure 2b.''' Important residues involved in the interface between MGPRX2 and Gq/ Gi subunits. Arrow pointing to the major difference between the interfaces, which comes from the final C-terminus residue on the G-alpha subunit. In Gq, there is a valine while in Gi, there is a phenylalanine. This pushes the Gi subunit 2Å away from the arginine residue on helix 6 of the transmembrane protein. All other interactions are nearly identical.]] | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
</jmolButton> | </jmolButton> | ||
</jmol> | </jmol> | ||
- | [[Image:PIF_resized.png|500px|right|thumb|'''Figure 3.''' Conserved PIF motif in 5HT2AR (teal) compared to the LLF motif found in MRGPRX2 (red). Transmembrane helices and residues are numbered and labeled to show how this structural change shifts the orientation of the helices.]] | + | [[Image:PIF_resized.png|500px|right|thumb|'''Figure 3.''' Conserved PIF motif in 5HT2AR (teal) compared to the LLF motif found in MRGPRX2 (red). Transmembrane helices and residues are numbered and labeled to show how this structural change shifts the orientation of the helices. PDBs: (MRGPRX2): 7s8l and (5HT2A): 6wha.]] |
Another motif found in most, but not all, A family GPCR’s is the PIF motif. The PIF residues (<scene name='90/904305/Llf_motif/5'>Leu-117, Leu-194, and Phe-232</scene>) are found on transmembrane helices 5, 3, and 6, respectively. In MRGPRX2, the PIF motif is changed to LLF residues. '''Figure 3''' shows the conserved PIF motif on 5HT2AR, <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_llf/1'>compared</scene> to the LLF motif on MRGPRX2. This change to LLF shifts helix 6 towards helix 3, and contributes to the tighter packing of helices <ref name="Cao">PMID: 34789874</ref> <ref name="Yang">PMID: 34789875</ref> and therefore a more surface-level ligand binding site. | Another motif found in most, but not all, A family GPCR’s is the PIF motif. The PIF residues (<scene name='90/904305/Llf_motif/5'>Leu-117, Leu-194, and Phe-232</scene>) are found on transmembrane helices 5, 3, and 6, respectively. In MRGPRX2, the PIF motif is changed to LLF residues. '''Figure 3''' shows the conserved PIF motif on 5HT2AR, <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_llf/1'>compared</scene> to the LLF motif on MRGPRX2. This change to LLF shifts helix 6 towards helix 3, and contributes to the tighter packing of helices <ref name="Cao">PMID: 34789874</ref> <ref name="Yang">PMID: 34789875</ref> and therefore a more surface-level ligand binding site. | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
==== DRY/ ERC Motif ==== | ==== DRY/ ERC Motif ==== | ||
- | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-15 at 10.23.20 AM.png|200px|left|thumb|'''Figure 4.''' ERC Motif]] | + | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-15 at 10.23.20 AM.png|200px|left|thumb|'''Figure 4.''' ERC Motif of MRGPRX2 with key residues shown as ball and stick. PDB: 7s8l.]] |
The E/DRY motif in most class A GPCRs is responsible for forming salt bridges with surrounding residues and TM6<ref name="Rovati">PMID: 17192495</ref>. These salt bridges maintain the inactive conformation of the receptor until ligand binding breaks the ionic "lock" from these interactions. MRGPRX2 has an ERC motif rather than the typically [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/A_Physical_Model_of_the_%CE%B22-Adrenergic_Receptor#conserved%20DRY%20motif conserved E/DRY Motif]. The amino acid residue shift from TYR-174 to CYS-128 allows compaction of the helices in MRGPRX2 where the standard TYR physically pushes the TMD helices apart('''Figure 4'''). The conserved residues E and R still form salt bridges with nearby residues. This and the closer packing of the helices contribute to a less significant TMD conformational change upon ligand binding ('''Figure 10'''). | The E/DRY motif in most class A GPCRs is responsible for forming salt bridges with surrounding residues and TM6<ref name="Rovati">PMID: 17192495</ref>. These salt bridges maintain the inactive conformation of the receptor until ligand binding breaks the ionic "lock" from these interactions. MRGPRX2 has an ERC motif rather than the typically [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/A_Physical_Model_of_the_%CE%B22-Adrenergic_Receptor#conserved%20DRY%20motif conserved E/DRY Motif]. The amino acid residue shift from TYR-174 to CYS-128 allows compaction of the helices in MRGPRX2 where the standard TYR physically pushes the TMD helices apart('''Figure 4'''). The conserved residues E and R still form salt bridges with nearby residues. This and the closer packing of the helices contribute to a less significant TMD conformational change upon ligand binding ('''Figure 10'''). | ||
<scene name='90/904306/Alignment_erc/2'>ERC/DRY Alignment</scene> | <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_erc/2'>ERC/DRY Alignment</scene> | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
==== Disulfide Bonds ==== | ==== Disulfide Bonds ==== | ||
- | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-27 at 5.45.52 PM.png|300px|right|thumb|'''Figure 5.''' Overlay of the 5HT2AR and MRGPRX2 TMP for comparison of disulfide bond location.]] | + | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-27 at 5.45.52 PM.png|300px|right|thumb|'''Figure 5.''' Overlay of the 5HT2AR and MRGPRX2 TMP for comparison of disulfide bond location. PDBs: (MRGPRX2): 7s8l and (5HT2A): 6wha.]] |
In a large majority of class A GPCRs, there is a conserved disulfide bond between extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) and transmembrane helix 3 (TM3). This bond has been proposed to have a role in structural stability, expression, and function of GPCRs<ref name="Naranjo">PMID: 25445670</ref>. The MRGPRX2 disulfide bond is between <scene name='90/904305/Disulfide_bond/2'>Cys-168 and Cys-180</scene> on TM helices 5 and 4, respectively. For example, the <scene name='90/904306/5ht2a_disulfide/2'>serotonin GPCR</scene> shows this disulfide bond between the ECL2 and TM3. Although this bond is in a different location than other class A GPCRs, there is evidence to suggest its location is essential for the signaling of the X2 receptor as the ECL2 instead located at the top of TM4 and TM5 allowing for the large, extracellular binding pocket observed in X2<ref name="Cao">PMID: 34789874</ref>. | In a large majority of class A GPCRs, there is a conserved disulfide bond between extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) and transmembrane helix 3 (TM3). This bond has been proposed to have a role in structural stability, expression, and function of GPCRs<ref name="Naranjo">PMID: 25445670</ref>. The MRGPRX2 disulfide bond is between <scene name='90/904305/Disulfide_bond/2'>Cys-168 and Cys-180</scene> on TM helices 5 and 4, respectively. For example, the <scene name='90/904306/5ht2a_disulfide/2'>serotonin GPCR</scene> shows this disulfide bond between the ECL2 and TM3. Although this bond is in a different location than other class A GPCRs, there is evidence to suggest its location is essential for the signaling of the X2 receptor as the ECL2 instead located at the top of TM4 and TM5 allowing for the large, extracellular binding pocket observed in X2<ref name="Cao">PMID: 34789874</ref>. | ||
<scene name='90/904306/Alignment_disulfide/1'>Disulfide Bond Alignment</scene> | <scene name='90/904306/Alignment_disulfide/1'>Disulfide Bond Alignment</scene> | ||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
== Function == | == Function == | ||
[[Image:Screen Shot 2022-04-162 at 2.49.26 PM.png|420px|right|thumb|'''Figure 8.'''Schematic representation of cellular response]] | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-04-162 at 2.49.26 PM.png|420px|right|thumb|'''Figure 8.'''Schematic representation of cellular response]] | ||
- | GPCRs undergo a conformational change in their 7TMD region upon ligand binding. This signal is then transduced to the G-protein allowing for downstream responses due to <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/1'>interactions</scene> between the alpha subunit of the G-protein and the transmembrane protein which activates g-protein by GTP exchange. | + | GPCRs undergo a conformational change in their 7TMD region upon ligand binding. This signal is then transduced to the G-protein allowing for downstream responses due to <scene name='90/904306/Interface_2/1'>interactions</scene> between the alpha subunit of the G-protein and the transmembrane protein which activates g-protein by GTP exchange. This downstream response may be in the form of release of small granules which can be received by a receptor to initiate a [https://proteopedia.org/wiki/index.php/Neurotransmitters#Serotonin_receptors%20Serotonin%20receptors pathological response] (figure 8)<ref name="Porebski">PMID: 30619367</ref>. |
=== Before Activation === | === Before Activation === | ||
- | The culmination of different motifs observed in MRGPRX2 compared to other class A GPCRs leads to external membrane ligand binding. The MRGPRX2 GPCR undergoes a much smaller conformational change upon ligand binding compared to other Class A GPCRs due to surface level binding versus deep helix binding ('''Figure 9'''). | + | The culmination of different motifs observed in MRGPRX2 compared to other class A GPCRs leads to external membrane ligand binding. The MRGPRX2 GPCR undergoes a much smaller conformational change upon ligand binding compared to other Class A GPCRs due to surface level binding versus deep helix binding ('''Figure 9'''). This smaller change can be seen as only minor extracellular movement occurs in MRGRPX2 upon binding compared to other GPCRs which can undergo loop and helical conformational changes<ref name="Hoffmann">PMID: 18059316</ref>. |
=== After Activation === | === After Activation === | ||
- | After ligand binding and transmembrane protein activation, this signal is transmitted to the alpha subunit of the G-protein which undergoes chemical and conformational changes. The alpha subunit is initially bound with GDP which is then physically replaced by GTP leading to conformational changes. These changes can be seen in this [https://youtu.be/k4fjSZV_-OQ video] of a G-protein alpha subunit activation derived from common rats. | + | After ligand binding and transmembrane protein activation, this signal is transmitted to the alpha subunit of the G-protein which undergoes chemical and conformational changes. The alpha subunit is initially bound with GDP which is then physically replaced by GTP leading to conformational changes. These changes can be seen in this [https://youtu.be/k4fjSZV_-OQ video] of a G-protein alpha subunit activation derived from common rats. This video was constructed by one of the page's authors using PDB files 1bof and 1cip. |
- | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-282 at 6.59.44 PM.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 9.''' Overlay of unbound (transparent) and bound (opaque) transmembrane proteins of both MRGRPX2 (left) and 5-HT2AR (right).]] | + | [[Image:Screen Shot 2022-03-282 at 6.59.44 PM.png|500px|center|thumb|'''Figure 9.''' Overlay of unbound (transparent) and bound (opaque) transmembrane proteins of both MRGRPX2 (left) and 5-HT2AR (right). PDBs: (MRGPRX2): 7s8l and (5HT2A): 6wha.]] |
=== Clinical Relevance === | === Clinical Relevance === |
Revision as of 00:16, 19 April 2022
MRGPRX2 Human Itch G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR)
|
References
- ↑ Tuteja N. Signaling through G protein coupled receptors. Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Oct;4(10):942-7. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.10.9530. Epub 2009, Oct 14. PMID:19826234 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.10.9530
- ↑ Hauser AS, Attwood MM, Rask-Andersen M, Schioth HB, Gloriam DE. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Dec;16(12):829-842. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.178. Epub, 2017 Oct 27. PMID:29075003 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.178
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Porebski G, Kwiecien K, Pawica M, Kwitniewski M. Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2) in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;9:3027. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027. eCollection, 2018. PMID:30619367 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03027
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Dondalska A, Ronnberg E, Ma H, Palsson SA, Magnusdottir E, Gao T, Adam L, Lerner EA, Nilsson G, Lagerstrom M, Spetz AL. Amelioration of Compound 48/80-Mediated Itch and LL-37-Induced Inflammation by a Single-Stranded Oligonucleotide. Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 30;11:559589. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.559589. eCollection, 2020. PMID:33101278 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.559589
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, Han L, Undem BJ, Kulka M, Dong X. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature. 2015 Mar 12;519(7542):237-41. doi: 10.1038/nature14022. Epub 2014 Dec 17. PMID:25517090 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14022
- ↑ 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 Cao C, Kang HJ, Singh I, Chen H, Zhang C, Ye W, Hayes BW, Liu J, Gumpper RH, Bender BJ, Slocum ST, Krumm BE, Lansu K, McCorvy JD, Kroeze WK, English JG, DiBerto JF, Olsen RHJ, Huang XP, Zhang S, Liu Y, Kim K, Karpiak J, Jan LY, Abraham SN, Jin J, Shoichet BK, Fay JF, Roth BL. Structure, function and pharmacology of human itch GPCRs. Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):170-175. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04126-6. Epub 2021, Nov 17. PMID:34789874 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04126-6
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 Yang F, Guo L, Li Y, Wang G, Wang J, Zhang C, Fang GX, Chen X, Liu L, Yan X, Liu Q, Qu C, Xu Y, Xiao P, Zhu Z, Li Z, Zhou J, Yu X, Gao N, Sun JP. Structure, function and pharmacology of human itch receptor complexes. Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7887):164-169. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04077-y. Epub 2021, Nov 17. PMID:34789875 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04077-y
- ↑ Kamato D, Thach L, Bernard R, Chan V, Zheng W, Kaur H, Brimble M, Osman N, Little PJ. Structure, Function, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential of the G Protein, Galpha/q,11. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Mar 24;2:14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014. eCollection, 2015. PMID:26664886 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2015.00014
- ↑ Trzaskowski B, Latek D, Yuan S, Ghoshdastider U, Debinski A, Filipek S. Action of molecular switches in GPCRs--theoretical and experimental studies. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(8):1090-109. doi: 10.2174/092986712799320556. PMID:22300046 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986712799320556
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Katritch V, Fenalti G, Abola EE, Roth BL, Cherezov V, Stevens RC. Allosteric sodium in class A GPCR signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014 May;39(5):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.002. Epub , 2014 Apr 21. PMID:24767681 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.002
- ↑ Rovati GE, Capra V, Neubig RR. The highly conserved DRY motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: beyond the ground state. Mol Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;71(4):959-64. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.029470. Epub 2006 Dec , 27. PMID:17192495 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.029470
- ↑ Naranjo AN, Chevalier A, Cousins GD, Ayettey E, McCusker EC, Wenk C, Robinson AS. Conserved disulfide bond is not essential for the adenosine A2A receptor: Extracellular cysteines influence receptor distribution within the cell and ligand-binding recognition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Feb;1848(2):603-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.010., Epub 2014 Nov 16. PMID:25445670 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.010
- ↑ Olivella M, Caltabiano G, Cordomi A. The role of Cysteine 6.47 in class A GPCRs. BMC Struct Biol. 2013 Mar 15;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-13-3. PMID:23497259 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-13-3
- ↑ Hoffmann C, Zurn A, Bunemann M, Lohse MJ. Conformational changes in G-protein-coupled receptors-the quest for functionally selective conformations is open. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;153 Suppl 1:S358-66. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707615. Epub, 2007 Dec 3. PMID:18059316 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707615
- ↑ Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Robledo G, Delgado M. Cortistatin, a new antiinflammatory peptide with therapeutic effect on lethal endotoxemia. J Exp Med. 2006 Mar 20;203(3):563-71. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052017. Epub 2006 Feb, 21. PMID:16492802 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20052017